Thursday, March 15, 2012

Supporting Evidence For Theme!


Debi Oulu:

“My story is all of our stories because if there is one thing that we all have in common, cross gender, cross race, cross world, it is our obsessive pre-occupation with our sexuality.” These are words from the artist, Debi Oulu from an interview she did with “Erotikos Film Festival”. Much of her work is highly erotic, and this in combination with its blatant, shocking, approach to depicting sexual organs comes across as almost crude and somewhat gross. In a critique of her work titled, “An Artist without Borders” by Dr. Dalia Hakker-Orion, Art Critic , it is written, “After what she calls, ‘the year of the teddy bears’, she began to create art mainly of male genitalia and to represent the attraction between the sexes, seduction through sculpture, video art and multimedia.” These two sources make it evident that her work is all about sexuality and seduction, and it is her material choice and bizarre application of the erotic imagery (think the “human climbing wall”) that she fits my theme.



Monica Cook:

In a review of Monica Cook’s work it is said, “Cook’s nude women continue to be engaged with gorgeously rendered erotic food in scenes that elicit a range of emotion in the viewer from mesmerized hilarity to horror.” In another critique of her work I read, “Monica Cook paints beautiful and disturbing portraits of women.” I interpreted her paintings as erotic because of the way she incorporated food, much like a painted version of another artist I am interested in, Victoria Gaitan, she juxtaposes food with nude females. She uses the food as a vehicle to induce seduction and suggest eroticism by using it to cover the women. Aesthetically, the skin of the women looks slimy and grossly covered In food, but still maintains a link to eroticism. This is why her wok relates so heavily to my theme.




Sri Whipple:

I found the following notes from a review of Sri Whipple’s work in The Salt Lake Tribune. “The truth is, little of Whipple's work shows graphic nudity. Hanging on the walls, for instance, there's maybe one nipple and a phallic cartoon garden hose. Still, there's no denying his colorful voluptuous figures seem inspired by a demented balloon twister. Some of his hyper erotic canvases appear to writhe with legs, thighs, rumps and high heels.”

I found the article very interesting because it is true, there is nothing blatantly disgusting or alarming in the pop art inspired paintings he creates. Rather I think it is that slight and subtle connection or allusion to eroticism that shocks the audience. He seems to combine balloons and softly modeled forms with sexual imagery to hint at sexual acts and organs. While some find his work alarming and disgusting, I think his technical modeling of the paint is beautiful, and I like the shock value of discovering these phallic balloons or nipples.


Kim Joon:

I found this from a review of two of his works, by Christies, titled, “Stay”. Here is what the critic had to say: “…its innocence overturned on the bare skin of a submissively seated female, reluctant yet subtly tempted by the erotically crimson hand, parallel to the wicked mother's poisonous red apple.”

I interpreted the red hand reaching out to the girl as some sort of biblical or fantastical symbol possibly relating to sin and sexuality. It is said that the female is “subtly tempted by the erotically crimson hand...” I learned that yes, the hand universally has an erotic quality. At the same time, I think it is still very creepy and gross looking. It looks almost sickeningly seductive, like an unwanted attack or some sort of harassment. This is clearly related to my theme of the grotesque and unusual suggesting sexuality and eroticism.


Georg Herold:

I found the following in a review at a site called “Sculpture News” : “Georg Herold, who belongs to the same generation as Sigmar Polke, offers two enormous colorful nudes (one purple, the other an eye-scorching coral), like voluptuous paper cut-outs by Matisse given volume and then stretched almost to snapping point. In the manner of Expressionist art, the effect is strained, tense and somewhat unsettling - but in a good way.”

His work is described as both “voluptuous” and “unsettling”. The image of the two forms I chose for this project are angular women with their legs spread in seemingly suggestedly erotic positions. This review of herold’s work backs up my interpretation by calling it unsettling, because that adds to my correlation between the bizarre or unusal and the sexual.



Cj Jilek:

I found this information on her work in a brief bio of her on the Carbondale Clay Center website: “Through her work she questions ideas of beauty, attraction, eroticism, adaptation and desire.”

CJ’s work related to my theme of eroticism and while it is not necessarily bizarre or gross, it is unusual. I am inspired by her cross over between the plant world and human world, and their similarities in reproduction and life processes. Her work is incredibly, technically rendered, and formally, looks flawless. Her ability to link plants and their pollination and reproduction abilities to homo sapien sex is strikingly unusual but works well because of her attention to detail. She exemplifies my theme because of this stretch she forces from those two separate worlds.



Patrick Veillet:

The pieces I had found from the artist Patrick Veillet were sculptural accessories, much like jewelry but wit a lot of fine arts emphasis. To much of my surprise, he is actually a perfume and fashion designer. And furthermore, I have had a lot of trouble finding information about him because he is French and his entire website is French as well as most of the interviews and critiques of his work. I did find an interesting interview that was in a magazine that was titled, “The extreme beauty of the inside”. Here is what he had to say:

“The concept of exomorphism considers the hidden sensuality of living bodies. I have a purely plastic attitude to this dimension of life. The skeleton hidden within humans is frightening whereas the “exoskeleton” of shellfish or insects is seen as beautiful. This sensitivity has led me to consider exteriorization: I wanted to apply the same plastic attitude to the inner skeleton. This escaped what we are used to seeing and involves a relationship with the strange and extreme. I have tried to extract a poetry of form that is applied to design. My objects inaugurate a new approach to design that pushes form to extremes. Likewise, work on textures helps breathe life into objects. The dorsal spine necklace in self-lightning glass is halfway between a sculpture and the fashion accessory. It is jewelry with dreamlike and mutant forms that constructs a new mythology. Techno-naturalism illustrates this paradoxical will to interpret the natural through high-tech.”

He blurs the lines between humans and other animals, including insects. This in combination with the fact that he is taking something generally seen as not beautiful or strange and extreme and pushes that on peoples bodies calling attention to their sensuality and humanism is absolutely beautiful and exemplifies my theme perfectly.

(The link is his site because it was the only place I could find the English translated version of this magazine published interview)

Jim Duvall:

“His art has been shown at the Seattle Erotic Art Festival and many other erotic art festivals around North America. He helped start The Betty Pages, an LGBT magazine serving Whatcom and Skagit counties and was a writer and photographer for the magazine for 5 years. As a sexuality activist Mr. Duvall has volunteered for many organizations over the years. He is a founder and former President of the Board of Directors of the Center for Sex Positive Culture (nee Wetspot). He founded the Seattle Erotic Art Festival. He is a past President and Board member of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom.”

The only information I could find published outside of the artist’s website was that on his character and his life actions, not particularly his work. But through this, it is made more evident that his art is absolutely, positively about sex. I find that his work exemplify my theme because he often uses the human body to altar it and contort it in ways it doesn’t ordinarily conform to on its own. It is through these manipulations that he photographs these bodies. The images he creates are rather alarming and disturbing, but still overtly erotic.



Victoria F. Gaitan:

The following is from a review of her solo exhibition in D.C.: “Gaitán’s work focuses on female subjects, and in the past several years, she has created provocative images of women that evoke in us a sense of beauty, chaos and at times, decay.” When I saw some of Gaitan’s work at a different gallery in Reston, I was surrounded with images of a beautiful woman smothered in food, providing a sense of beauty and eroticism while looking dirty and smothered in a grotesque amount of doughnuts. Her work is the perfect middle ground that I was working to unveil through my theme: overwhelming disgust and intense eroticism.

11th image?

I am posting this image from an artist I have been following and have seen in an exhibit in Reston, Virginia. Her work related to my theme, and I am posting this because I might have to replace another artist' image with hers, as I have not been able to find adequate information or critiques and reviews from all of the other artists I have chosen.



Victoria F. Gaitan  “Sweet Meat 01” 2010

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

If I were Clement Greenberg...





In order to look and view this painting more critically, we must ignore the pictorial illusion, the subject matter and the narrative. Though this painting show cases some beautiful pigment, especially the broad ranges of neutral colors, with blue highlighting the skin and the background to tie the composition together, the figures are too dimensional. There is no flatness in the painting, and there is too much atmospheric light. The only segment of the painting I enjoy is the plain background and the runnyness of the paint at the bottom of the piece, where there is no real depiction of anything realistic. Overall, this is a pretty terrible piece.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

5 More Images!




 Debi Oulu
“Hold on Tight”
  2011

 “A human climbing wall in which the holds are made of sexual parts of male and female bodies – penis, vagina, ass, breasts and mouth (all but the breasts being orifices). How does the climber feel having to jam his/her toes and fingers into these orifices in order to get to the top?” This is what Oulu says about this work. I think it is both bizarre and grotesque, and very compliant with my theme. I am awed at how her creativity pushed her to combine such a plutonic, every day activity such as rock climbing with overt sexual objects. 





 CJ Jilek
“Tart”
2010

 Some of her pieces are singular objects that stand alone, but I am more drawn to her pieces where there are two different object interacting, like the image I have shown. Her work fits with my theme because it is all about creating metaphors from the natural world, specifically how plants reproduce, and linking that to human sexuality. My theme of the grotesque and the sexual plays a role because the pieces she creates are unrecognized in the sense they do not look like plants. To me, they look like bizarre, abstracted interpretations of body parts. They are seductively slimy and sensuously polished and smooth.





 Patrick Veillet
“2010”

 Veillet’s two pieces I chose are very anatomical, antler like, and vertebrae like which are appear animalistic and almost gross. Because they are placed directly on bare skin, his wearable sculptures become sensual. Furthermore, the way he has photographed these pieces on the body, he has left one breast is exposed, which further accentuates its sexual nature.





 Jim Duvall
“Newtons Cradle”
2011

Duvall’s photography is overtly erotic, but this image in particular transforms eroticism into a grotesque objectification of the female body. The way he treats the female forms by hanging them up, upside down, with their sexual organs staring at us straight in the face is hard to look at, as it is. This arrangement also reminds me very much of the way meat are hung up, strung together and side by side.




 Georg Herold
2011

His works are grotesque in their very angular abstractions with overly sexed stretching positions and the way he handles the material and modeling of the figure. His work is different than a lot of the others I have addressed in relation to this theme. I like the not as obvious connection between the gross and the sexual.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Five Images Relating to Theme




KIM JOON
Two Pieces Side by Side:
“Stay Snow White”, “Stay- Gone With Wind”
2007

Joon uses images of nude bodies in visually enticing ways with pieces and parts of the body that look bizarre and gross. The interaction between multiple bodies and their parts, especially because they are always naked, elicits a sense of sexuality.





SRI WHIPPLE
“Self Portrait as the thinker”
2009



Whipple uses abstract forms that are gross in appearance and still heavy in their correlation to sexual reproductive organs to create intriguing pop art-esque paintings.






MONICA COOK
“Succi”
2009


Monica Cook brings together the world of food and the world of female contact and sexuality. Her paintings are both macabre and erotic.  






CRYSTAL BARBRE
“Hippopotamus Amphibius”
(Do not know exact year, but created after 2008)



Babre creates very explicit sexual imagery in her paintings and juxtaposes animal heads on the human’s body to unite wild animals with human sexuality. The audience is often taken back by her vulgar imagery. The animal’s heads come across as bizarre and perverted. I am interested in the links she makes in her work. 






MARCOS CHIN
"Machoman"
2011


Marcos Chin explores gender roles and the sexual roles of males. In this sculpture he beautifies male orgasm. This action would otherwise be seen as absurd or disgusting, but in this sculpture he makes it playful and childish almost, so the true action that is taking place is almost hidden.

Initial Artist Research (Make up for class Feb 7)


 Monica Cook graduated from SCAD in 1996 with a BA in painting. She is also trained in art therapy and has been a special education substitute teacher. She started a mural business about ten years ago, and that and shows and selling her work makes up her income.  She now lives and works in New York.

She is primarily a painter, but also does photography, drawings and animation. The work though, that connects to my theme are some of her paintings.  The painting below particularly embodies my theme of the relations between the grotesque and the sexual. Denoted in this painting are many women’s legs, feet, hands and bottoms, accompanied by one breast, octopus tentacles, and messy, slimy food. The women look like they are tangled together, but their clenching hands and bare bodies elude to a sexual nature. Cook captures the sheen and texture of the women’s skin covered with food, as well as depicts their body parts very realistically. I classify this painting as both grotesque and beautiful. The women are in erotic positions covered in food, which makes their bodies slippery and sexual.  A quote from a review oh her work is as follows: “Cook’s nude women engage with gorgeously rendered erotic food in scenes that elicit a range of emotion in the viewer from mesmerized hilarity to horror…”



            I think Monica Cook very successfully converges beautiful bodies with macabre slimy food and tentacles in. Seeing her work, I am inspired to explore what other substances I can use or depict in my work that can go from being completely every day life objects, to overtly erotic.



Thursday, February 2, 2012

Connotations and Denotations

 


This is an oil painting by the artist Crystal Barbre, and is part of the Magnetisme Animal Series. Throughout the series she creates provocative imagery using the female body primarily, both by itself and in conjunction with the male body in the midst of sexual acts. In all of the pieces of this series, the head of the female figure is that of an animal. In this particular painting, the denotation is a woman’s body with a head of a gazelle, in a very seductive pose with slightly crossed legs and pointed toes, in the act of lowering down her garters. The connotation I have when looking at the piece is a sense of power within the figure as well as a graceful approach to sexuality. The hands have a sense of delicacy, and even the color of the garter is soft and peaceful. At the same time, I believe that the artist replaces the woman’s head with that of a wild animal to bring a sense of power to the image. She is commenting about women’s ability to use their bodies in a powerful manner to seduce men.  I believe this is why she uses animal heads in her series; because women, just like men, have the ability and power to be animalistic with their sexuality.