In order to look and view this painting more critically, we
must ignore the pictorial illusion, the subject matter and the narrative. Though
this painting show cases some beautiful pigment, especially the broad ranges of
neutral colors, with blue highlighting the skin and the background to tie the
composition together, the figures are too dimensional. There is no flatness in
the painting, and there is too much atmospheric light. The only segment of the
painting I enjoy is the plain background and the runnyness of the paint at the
bottom of the piece, where there is no real depiction of anything realistic.
Overall, this is a pretty terrible piece.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
5 More Images!
Debi Oulu
“Hold on Tight”
2011
“A human climbing wall in which the holds are made of sexual
parts of male and female bodies – penis, vagina, ass, breasts and mouth (all
but the breasts being orifices). How does the climber feel having to jam
his/her toes and fingers into these orifices in order to get to the top?” This
is what Oulu says about this work. I think it is both bizarre and grotesque,
and very compliant with my theme. I am awed at how her creativity pushed her to
combine such a plutonic, every day activity such as rock climbing with overt
sexual objects.
CJ Jilek
“Tart”
2010
Some of her pieces are
singular objects that stand alone, but I am more drawn to her pieces where
there are two different object interacting, like the image I have shown. Her
work fits with my theme because it is all about creating metaphors from the
natural world, specifically how plants reproduce, and linking that to human
sexuality. My theme of the grotesque and the sexual plays a role because the
pieces she creates are unrecognized in the sense they do not look like plants.
To me, they look like bizarre, abstracted interpretations of body parts. They
are seductively slimy and sensuously polished and smooth.
Patrick Veillet
“2010”
Veillet’s two pieces I chose are very
anatomical, antler like, and vertebrae like which are appear animalistic and
almost gross. Because they are placed directly on bare skin, his wearable sculptures
become sensual. Furthermore, the way he has photographed these pieces on the
body, he has left one breast is exposed, which further accentuates its sexual
nature.
Jim Duvall
“Newtons Cradle”
2011
Duvall’s photography is overtly erotic, but
this image in particular transforms eroticism into a grotesque objectification
of the female body. The way he treats the female forms by hanging them up,
upside down, with their sexual organs staring at us straight in the face is
hard to look at, as it is. This arrangement also reminds me very much of the
way meat are hung up, strung together and side by side.
Georg Herold
2011
His works are grotesque in their very angular abstractions
with overly sexed stretching positions and the way he handles the material and
modeling of the figure. His work is different than a lot of the others I have
addressed in relation to this theme. I like the not as obvious connection
between the gross and the sexual.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Five Images Relating to Theme
KIM JOON
Two Pieces Side by
Side:
“Stay Snow White”,
“Stay- Gone With Wind”
2007
Joon uses images of
nude bodies in visually enticing ways with pieces and parts of the body that look
bizarre and gross. The interaction between multiple bodies and their parts,
especially because they are always naked, elicits a sense of sexuality.
SRI WHIPPLE
“Self Portrait as the
thinker”
2009
Whipple uses abstract
forms that are gross in appearance and still heavy in their correlation to
sexual reproductive organs to create intriguing pop art-esque paintings.
MONICA COOK
“Succi”
2009
Monica Cook brings
together the world of food and the world of female contact and sexuality. Her
paintings are both macabre and erotic.
CRYSTAL BARBRE
“Hippopotamus
Amphibius”
(Do not know exact
year, but created after 2008)
Babre creates very
explicit sexual imagery in her paintings and juxtaposes animal heads on the
human’s body to unite wild animals with human sexuality. The audience is often
taken back by her vulgar imagery. The animal’s heads come across as bizarre
and perverted. I am interested in the links she makes in her work.
MARCOS CHIN
"Machoman"
2011
Initial Artist Research (Make up for class Feb 7)
Monica Cook graduated from SCAD in 1996 with a BA in
painting. She is also trained in art therapy and has been a special education
substitute teacher. She started a mural business about ten years ago, and that
and shows and selling her work makes up her income. She now lives and works in New York.
She is primarily a painter, but
also does photography, drawings and animation. The work though, that connects
to my theme are some of her paintings.
The painting below particularly embodies my theme of the relations
between the grotesque and the sexual. Denoted in this painting are many women’s
legs, feet, hands and bottoms, accompanied by one breast, octopus tentacles,
and messy, slimy food. The women look like they are tangled together, but their
clenching hands and bare bodies elude to a sexual nature. Cook captures the
sheen and texture of the women’s skin covered with food, as well as depicts
their body parts very realistically. I classify this painting as both grotesque
and beautiful. The women are in erotic positions covered in food, which makes
their bodies slippery and sexual.
A quote from a review oh her work is as follows: “Cook’s nude women
engage with gorgeously rendered erotic food in scenes that elicit a range of
emotion in the viewer from mesmerized hilarity to horror…”
I
think Monica Cook very successfully converges beautiful bodies with macabre
slimy food and tentacles in. Seeing her work, I am inspired to explore what
other substances I can use or depict in my work that can go from being
completely every day life objects, to overtly erotic.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Connotations and Denotations

This is an oil painting by the artist Crystal Barbre, and is part of the Magnetisme
Animal Series. Throughout the series she creates provocative imagery using the
female body primarily, both by itself and in conjunction with the male body in
the midst of sexual acts. In all of the pieces of this series, the head of the female figure
is that of an animal. In this particular painting, the denotation is a woman’s
body with a head of a gazelle, in a very seductive pose with slightly crossed
legs and pointed toes, in the act of lowering down her garters. The connotation
I have when looking at the piece is a sense of power within the figure as well
as a graceful approach to sexuality. The hands have a sense of delicacy, and
even the color of the garter is soft and peaceful. At the same time, I believe
that the artist replaces the woman’s head with that of a wild animal to bring a
sense of power to the image. She is commenting about women’s ability
to use their bodies in a powerful manner to seduce men. I believe this is why she uses animal heads in her
series; because women, just like men, have the ability and power to be
animalistic with their sexuality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)